This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
During the summer of 2010, a biotic survey of tardigrades was conducted along a latitudinal transect in central Alaska from the Kenai Peninsula, via Fairbanks and the Arctic Circle to the coastal plain. Work was centred at the Toolik and Bonanza Creek Long Term Ecological Research Network sites and supplemented by opportunistic collections from the Kenai Peninsula and Anchorage areas. The 235 samples collected at 20 sites over 10 degrees of latitude yielded 1463 tardigrades representing two classes, three orders, 10 families, 23 genera and 73 species from 142 positive samples. A total of 50 species are new to Alaska, increasing the state's known species richness to 84. Several environmental metrics, such as pH, substrate, elevation, location and habitat were measured, recorded and analysed along the latitudinal gradient. Contrary to expectations, pH did not appear to be a predictor of tardigrade abundance or distribution. Density and species richness were relatively consistent across sites. However, the assemblages were highly variable within and between sites at only 14–20% similarity. We detected no correlation between species diversity and latitudinal or environmental gradients, though this may be affected by a high (59.9%) occurrence of single-species samples (containing individuals of only one species). Estimates of species richness were calculated for Alaska (118) and the Arctic (172). Our efforts increased the number of known species in Alaska to 84, and those results led us to question the validity of the estimate numbers.
Biodiversity is most often thought of as species richness or the number of species in a given area (Costello
Vicente (
McInnes (1994) documented ca. 700 species of limno-terrestrial tardigrades, recorded more than half of those to the European Palearctic, but only 22 as cosmopolitan. Pilato & Binda (
The first report of a tardigrade from Alaska was by Mathews (
Tardigrade collections in Alaska, 2009, arranged from north to south latitudes.
| Cluster code | Site codea | Site | Latitude | Longitude | Elevation (m) | No. of samples | No. of positive samples | No. of specimens | No. of species |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toolik Lake | T | Roadside Creek | 69.05930 | 148.49978 | 312.1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| Toolik Lake | S | Sagway River | 68.46167 | 148.50859 | 472.4 | 9 | 4 | 75 | 17 |
| Toolik Lake | R | Slope Mountain | 68.42592 | 149.02228 | 674.2 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 4 |
| Toolik Lake | Q | Kupa River | 68.38813 | 149.24832 | 755.9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Toolik Lake | P | Toolik field station | 68.37695 | 149.35592 | 722.1 | 23 | 9 | 181 | 26 |
| Toolik Lake | O | Brooks Range | 68.14498 | 149.25371 | 906.8 | 14 | 3 | 25 | 9 |
| Arctic Circle | N | Arctic Circle | 66.33334 | 150.48644 | 361.8 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Arctic Circle | M | Finger Mountain | 66.21462 | 150.27686 | 650.7 | 12 | 7 | 92 | 18 |
| Bonanza Creek | L | Alyeska Pipeline | 64.92909 | 147.62944 | 238.7 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| Bonanza Creek | K | Winner Creek | 64.51492 | 147.49820 | 205.7 | 13 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
| Bonanza Creek | J | Bonanza Creek | 64.42325 | 148.19439 | 160.6 | 31 | 22 | 176 | 20 |
| Kenai Peninsula | I | Crows Creek | 61.02707 | 149.07223 | 802.5 | 85 | 66 | 584 | 38 |
| Kenai Peninsula | H | Girdwood Outlook | 60.92840 | 149.34700 | 11.3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 1 |
| Kenai Peninsula | G | Granite Mine | 60.57183 | 148.13301 | 183.2 | 5 | 3 | 89 | 5 |
| Kenai Peninsula | F | Kenai Lake | 60.49012 | 149.74716 | 247.2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| Kenai Peninsula | E | Moose Pass | 60.47070 | 149.40123 | 981.5 | 5 | 4 | 29 | 7 |
| Kenai Peninsula | D | Seward Highway | 60.39510 | 149.29020 | 375.2 | 9 | 3 | 29 | 5 |
| Kenai Peninsula | C | Swetman Mine | 60.36646 | 149.34685 | 165.5 | 3 | 1 | 25 | 2 |
| Kenai Peninsula | B | Lost Lake | 60.26337 | 149.42240 | 594.4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Kenai Peninsula | A | Brown Bear Prospect | 60.20323 | 149.21058 | 177.7 | 5 | 4 | 87 | 13 |
| Total | 235 | 142 | 1463 |
aSee
McInnes (
More recently, Schill, Forster, Dandekar & Wolf, 2010 described
We collected tardigrades along a north–south transect through central Alaska, comparing tardigrade communities in terms of sample similarity, density differences and composition in relation to pH and other environmental factors. We used our data to estimate tardigrade diversity for Alaska and the Arctic.
During the summer of 2010, a biotic survey of tardigrades was conducted along a latitudinal transect in central Alaska from the Kenai Peninsula, via Fairbanks and the Arctic Circle to the coastal plain. These were supplemented by additional collections gathered between 2007 and 2010 between −147° and −151° longitude (
Tardigrade collections: (a) prior collections by Meininger & Spratt (
Sampling sites were grouped into four latitudinal “regions”. (1) “Kenai” (60–61°N) comprised nine distinct sites between 60 and 62°N. (2) “Bonanza” (64°N) was made up of three sites in and around the Bonanza Creek Long Term Ecological Research site (LTER). (3) “Arctic Circle” (66°N) sampling took place on and near the Arctic Circle. (4) “Toolik” (68–69°N) samples were collected in the area of the Toolik LTER (
Hand-collected moss, lichen and leaf litter samples were placed in article bags labelled with global positioning system coordinates, substrate and habitat, and allowed to dry at ambient temperatures, prior to laboratory processing.
Dry samples were weighed on an auto-taring scale (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) to±0.1 g and 10 ml of spring water (pH ca. 7.00) added per gram of sample. After 30 min, the sample was stirred, distressed and the pH taken via a LabPro pH sensor and Logger Pro data retrieving software (Vernier Software & Technology, Beaverton, OR). On the following day, all tardigrades were removed from the sample using an EMZ dissecting microscope (Meiji Techno America, Santa Clara, CA, USA), at 20–30×, reflected light and an Irwin loop. Tardigrade numbers were divided by sample dry weight to derive comparative density data.
Specimens were permanently mounted on slides in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) media for identification (Miller
Tardigrades were identified using a BX 51differential interference contrast (DIC) microscope (Olympus, Center Valley, PA, USA) along with the keys of Pilato & Binda (
To determine the potential influence of pH, we compared the pH of tardigrade-positive with tardigrade-negative samples using ANOVA to test for differences.
To determine the probability of finding positive tardigrade samples with the same frequency along our latitudinal gradient, we normalized the data via an arcsine transformation for a Pearson's correlation analysis of individual samples. This test was also applied in determining if species richness changed along the latitudinal gradient. ANOVA, using PROC GLM in the SAS software package (SAS Institute
EstimateS version 8.2 software (Colwell et al.
A total of 142 of the 235 (58.9%) samples taken from the 20 sites were positive for at least one tardigrade species. The 1463 individual tardigrades collected represent 2 classes, 3 orders, 5 super-families, 10 families, 23 genera and 73 species. Some 50 species are new to Alaska, bringing species richness to 84 (
Tardigrades of Alaska
| Family | Genus | Species | 1938a | 1965a | 1982a | 1988a | 1998a | 2010a | 2012a | Site codes (north to south)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oreellidae | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | K | ||||||||
| Echiniscidae | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | C, G, I, M, P | ||||||||
|
|
X | M | ||||||||
|
|
X | G, I, K | ||||||||
|
|
X | X | A | |||||||
|
|
X | J | ||||||||
|
|
X | I | ||||||||
|
|
X | J, M | ||||||||
|
|
X | |||||||||
|
|
X | I | ||||||||
|
|
X | R | ||||||||
|
|
X | J | ||||||||
|
|
X | A, E, G, I, J, P, R, S | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | X | X | I, O | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | P | ||||||||
|
|
X | X | X | I | ||||||
|
|
X | S | ||||||||
|
|
X | I, P | ||||||||
| Milnesiidae | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | I, M, P | ||||||||
|
|
X | X | I, J, M, O, P, S | |||||||
|
|
X | J, O, S | ||||||||
| Eohypsibiidae | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | |||||||||
| Calohypsibiidae | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | X | I, M | |||||||
| Hypsibiidae | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | X | X | J | ||||||
|
|
X | |||||||||
|
|
X | X | P | |||||||
|
|
X | I | ||||||||
|
|
X | I, J, K, M, P | ||||||||
|
|
X | I | ||||||||
|
|
X | X | I, J, P | |||||||
|
|
X | O | ||||||||
|
|
X | |||||||||
|
|
X | P | ||||||||
|
|
X | A, E, G, H, I, J, M, P | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | I, P | ||||||||
|
|
X | I, P | ||||||||
|
|
X | X | X | A | ||||||
|
|
X | X | X | I | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | X | M, Q | |||||||
|
|
X | X | J | |||||||
|
|
X | X | X | C, D, I, J, L, O, P, S | ||||||
|
|
B, F, G, P | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | I, P | ||||||||
|
|
X | X | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | X | X | D, J, K, M | ||||||
|
|
X | I | ||||||||
|
|
X | I | ||||||||
| Ramazzottidae | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | X | B, I, J, M, R | |||||||
|
|
X | I, J | ||||||||
| Isohypsibioiidae | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | I | ||||||||
|
|
X | S | ||||||||
|
|
X | S | ||||||||
|
|
X | A, I, S | ||||||||
|
|
X | X | J | |||||||
|
|
X | |||||||||
|
|
X | X | J | |||||||
|
|
X | E, I, M, P, S | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | S, T | ||||||||
| Macrobiotidae | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | X | X | L, M, Q | ||||||
|
|
X | M | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | Q | ||||||||
|
|
X | I, K, P | ||||||||
|
|
X | |||||||||
|
|
X | X | ||||||||
|
|
X | A | ||||||||
|
|
X | X | X | H, K, L, M, O, Q, R | ||||||
|
|
X | X | X | X | A, C, F, H, I, K, L, M, O, Q, R | |||||
|
|
X | X | X | K | ||||||
|
|
X | |||||||||
|
|
X | K, N, Q | ||||||||
|
|
X | H | ||||||||
|
|
X | H | ||||||||
|
|
X | X | A, I, N | |||||||
|
|
X | X | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | X | X | H, L, M, Q | ||||||
|
|
X | A, I, Q | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | A, M | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | I, J, L, Q | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | |||||||||
|
|
X | Q | ||||||||
|
|
X | |||||||||
| Murrayidae | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | Q | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
X | T | ||||||||
|
|
X | |||||||||
| Totals | 1 | 7 | 27 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 73 | Total species 84 | ||
a1938 is Mathews
bSee
cNew records for North America.
dNew record for the Americas.
eNew records for the United States.
There were no significant pH differences between samples that contained tardigrades and those that did not (d.f.1,146
ANOVA indicated that tardigrade density did not vary significantly across each cluster d.f.3,96
Density of tardigrades from our four clusters of sites. No significant differences were found.
However, ANOVA did show that species richness varies between clusters (d.f.3,96
Tardigrade richness from our four clusters of sites. Only the Bonanza and Kenai sites were significantly different from one another.
Similarity (%) within and among clusters for tardigrade communities across Alaska.
| Kenai Peninsula | Bonanza | Brooks Range | Toolik | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenai Peninsula | 17.76 | 16.42 | 20.20 | 13.96 |
| Bonanza | 18.92 | 18.55 | 14.34 | |
| Brooks Range | 18.99 | 15.49 | ||
| Toolik | 14.08 |
EstimateS estimators proposed an Alaskan species richness of between 90 and 160 species; the median (Jack1 for both habitats) of all estimators estimates total species richness at 118 species or ca. 10% of global diversity.
While the survey was expected to add to the known tardigrade diversity of Alaska, a 150% increase is remarkable, as was the large number of species that occurred at only one sampling site. While we had collected large numbers of
Although pH is often cited as an important factor influencing the distribution (e.g., site suitability), density and species richness of tardigrades (Meininger et al.
These observations are consistent with the idea that the tardigrade communities along the study transect may be structured as much by stochastic factors associated with dispersal as they are by variables associated with habitat suitability (Convey & McInnes
These results suggest minimal differences between the structure of tardigrade communities across Alaska with respect to species richness and density. The variation was insufficient to produce any significant patterns. Many taxonomic groups exhibit latitudinal diversity gradients (Rosenzweig
Interestingly, within and among site, similarity indices were both within a relatively narrow range (14–20%) indicating that samples in close proximity to one another were no more likely to share a similar tardigrade assemblage as any other two random locations across Alaska (
Meyer & Hinton (
Bartels & Nelson (2007) examined 6220 specimens from 231 samples in GSMNP and developed a list of 73 species. Using EstimateS version 7.5, they estimated the probable species richness in the park to be 96 with a range of 86–105 species. Following their methods, we estimated the probable species richness for central Alaska to be 118, within a range of 90–160 species. Considering that the GSMNP is located at temperate latitudes and is 0.13% of the land mass of Alaska, these are not directly comparable studies. However, the model they established is informative as to the prediction of the diversity of a defined area.
The new list (
To summarize, previous studies have only documented a small portion of the Nearctic tardigrade community. While general ecological patterns may apply to this group of meiofauna, the spatial scale at which this study was conducted failed to identify any traditional distributional patterns. The relatively large number of species that occurred at a single site may also have obscured patterns. Identification of which environmental parameters, if any, strongly influence the distribution of tardigrades remains elusive. We feel that additional data of the spatial–temporal variation in abundance of tardigrades and the processes that generate them are needed to understand the basic ecology of this under-studied group.
This project was supported by US National Science Foundation grants, numbers DEB 0640847 to Baker University, DEB 0641051 to Fresno City College and DEB0640959 to Brigham Young University. We are grateful for the geographic information system-based Alaska map produced by Dr Jeff Miller of Missoula, MT. Stephanie Calloway, Carleigh Takemoto, Alex Arnett and Brittany Deegan provided hundreds of hours of invaluable effort in sampling, identification and database management. Philip Pugh was gracious with his time, independently verifying and confirming our findings using additional statistical tests. Bill Johansson provided suggestions and motivation to improve and shape the manuscript. We also want to particularly thank the reviewers of this manuscript. They took an exceptional amount of time and expended considerable effort in reviewing, editing and improving this article. Their efforts are greatly appreciated by the authors.