High-Arctic nesting geese occupying less favourable nest sites are more vulnerable to predation

  • Helen B. Anderson School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen
  • Eva Fuglei Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre
  • Jesper Madsen Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University
  • René van der Wal School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen
Keywords: Predator-prey interactions, Arctic foxes, pink-footed geese, late snowmelt


In a simple, rodent-free Arctic ecosystem in Svalbard, we assessed the nest-site characteristics of the main (and highly abundant) migratory herbivore—pink-footed geese (Anser brachyrhynchus)—to determine which nesting geese were preferentially attacked and killed by the only local predator of adult geese, the Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus). We collected data on goose carcasses and nest-site characteristics at one of the main pink-footed goose breeding areas in Svalbard. Arctic foxes depredated adult pink-footed geese from just over a quarter of the unsuccessful nests in the colony and carcasses were generally found just under 10 m away from a nest. Geese that occupied nests of poorer quality (limited visibility, further distance to forage patches and situated on flatter slopes) and were less well established (indicated by the low degree of fertilization from accumulations of goose droppings) were more likely to be depredated by Arctic foxes. As geese show a high degree of nest-site fidelity and preferentially occupy nests with better protection against depredation and closer to feeding areas, we propose that Arctic foxes targeted, and were more successful in killing younger, more inexperienced or low-quality geese that occupied less favourable nest sites.


Download data is not yet available.


Anderson H.B., Godfrey T.G., Woodin S.J. & van der Wal R. 2012. Finding food in a highly seasonal landscape: where and how pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus forage during the Arctic spring. Journal of Avian Biology 43, 415–422, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2012.05699.x.

Anderson H.B., Madsen J., Fuglei E., Jensen G.H., Woodin S.J. & van der Wal R. 2015. The dilemma of where to nest: influence of spring snow cover, food proximity and predator abundance on reproductive success of an Arctic-breeding migratory herbivore is dependent on nesting habitat choice. Polar Biology 38, 153–162, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00300-014-1574-y.

Anderson H.B., Madsen J., Woodin S.J. & van der Wal R. 2015. Where to settle in a rapidly expanding bird colony: a case study on colony expansion in High Arctic breeding geese. Behavoral Ecology and Sociobiology 69, 325–334, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1845-1.

Andrews P. 1988. Estimating slope for predicting fire behavior. Fire Management Notes 49, 16–18.

Avise J.C., Alisauskas R.T., Nelson W.S. & Ankney C.D. 1992. Matriarchal population genetic structure in an avian species with female natal philopatry. Evolution 46, 1084–1096, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb00621.x.

Björklund M. 1990. Nest failures in the scarlet rose finch Carpodacus erythrinus. Ibis 132, 613–617, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1990.tb00286.x.

Careau V., Lecomte N., Bêty J., Giroux J.-F., Gauthier G. & Berteaux D. 2008. Hoarding of pulsed resources: temporal variations in egg-caching by Arctic fox. Ecoscience 15, 268–276, http://dx.doi.org/10.2980/15-2-3097.

Cooch E.G., Jeffries R.L., Rockwell R.F. & Cooke F. 1993. Environmental change and the cost of philopatry: an example in the lesser snow goose. Oecologia 93, 128–138, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00321202.

Davis J.B., Kaminski R.M. & Stephens S.E. 1998. Wood duck eggshell membranes predict duckling numbers. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26, 299–301.

Eide N.E., Eid P.M., Prestrud P. & Swenson J.E. 2005. Dietary responses of Arctic foxes Alopex lagopus to changing prey across an Arctic landscape. Wildlife Biology 11, 109–121, http://dx.doi.org/10.2981/0909-6396(2005)11[109:DROAFA]2.0.CO;2.

Eide N.E., Jepsen J.U. & Prestrud P. 2004. Spatial organization of reproductive Arctic foxes Alopex lagopus: responses to changes in spatial and temporal availability of prey. Journal of Animal Ecology 73, 1056–1068, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00885.x.

Elvebakk A. 1997. Tundra diversity and ecological characteristics of Svalbard. In F.E. Wielgolaski (ed.): Ecosystems of the world. Vol. 3. Polar and alpine tundra. Pp. 347–359. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Finney G. & Cooke F. 1978. Reproductive habits in snow goose—influence of female age. Condor 80, 147–158, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1367914.

Fowler A.C., Eadie J.M. & Ely C.R. 2004. Relatedness and nesting dispersion within breeding populations of greater white-fronted geese. Condor 106, 600–607, http://dx.doi.org/10.1650/7446.

Frafjord K. 1990. A study of the pink-footed goose in Gipsdalen, Svalbard, during the pre-breeding and early breeding periods. In T. Severinsen & R. Hansson (eds.): Environmental atlas Gipsdalen, Svalbard. Vol. 3. Reports on the fauna of Gipsdalen. Norwegian Polar Institute Report 66. Pp. 1–18. Oslo: Norwegian Polar Research Institute.

Fretwell S.D. & Lucas H.L. 1969. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Part 1. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheoretica 1,16–36.

Goosemap 2012. Maps. Pink-footed goose. Moulting, non-breeding (two maps). Accessed on the internet at https://goosemap.nina.no/goosemap_eng/Maps-and-data/Maps on 27 February 2019.

Hamilton W.D. 1971. Geometry for the selfish herd. Journal of Theoretical Biology 31, 295–311, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5.

Ims R.A., Jepsen J.U., Stien A. & Yoccoz N.G. 2013. Science plan for COAT: Climate-ecological Observatory for Arctic Tundra. Fram Centre Report Series 1. Tromsø: Fram Centre.

Inglis I.R. 1977. The breeding behaviour of the pink-footed goose: behavioural correlates of nesting success. Animal Behaviour 25, 747–764, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-(77)90125-7.

Jepsen J.U., Eide N.E., Prestrud P. & Jacobsen L.B. 2002. The importance of prey distribution in habitat use by Arctic foxes (Alopex lagopus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 80, 418–429, http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/Z02-023.

Kurvers R.H.J.M., Prins H.H.T., van Wieren S.E., van Oers K., Nolet B.A. & Ydenberg R.C. 2009. The effect of personality on social foraging: shy barnacle geese scrounge more. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277, 601–608, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1474.

Larsson K. & van der Jeugd H.P. 1998. Continuing growth of the Baltic barnacle goose population: number of individuals and reproductive success in different colonies. In F. Mehlum et al. (eds.): Research on Arctic geese. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 200. Pp. 213–219. Oslo: Norwegian Polar Institute.

Løvenskiold H.L. 1964. No. 23. Anser fabalis brachyrhynchus. In H.L. Løvenskiold: Avifauna Svalbardensis. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 129. Pp. 125–134. Oslo: Norwegian Polar Institute.

Madsen J., Jensen G.H., Cottaar F., Amstrup O., Bak M., Bakken J., Balsby T.T.J., Christensen T.K., Clausen K.K., Frikke J., Gundersen O.M., Kjeldsen J.P., Koffijberg K., Kuijken E., Månsson J., Nicolaisen P.I., Nielsen H.H., Nilsson L., Reinsborg T., Ødegaard P.I., Pessa J., Shimmings P., Tombre I. & Verschuere C. 2018. Svalbard pink-footed goose. Population status report 2017–2018. Doc. AEWA/EGMIWG/3.8. Leeuwarden, The Netherlands: AWEA European Goose Management International Working Group.

Madsen J., Kuijken E., Meire P., Cottaar F., Haitjema T., Nicolaisen P.I., Bønes T. & Mehlum F. 1999. Pink-footed goose Anser brachyrhynchus: Svalbard. In J. Madsen et al. (eds.): Goose populations of the western Palearctic. A review of status and distribution. Pp. 82–93. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wetlands International.

Madsen J., Tamstorf M., Klaassen M., Eide N., Glahder C., Rigét F., Nyegaard H. & Cottaar F. 2007. Effects of snow cover on the timing and success of reproduction in High-Arctic pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus. Polar Biology 30, 1363–1372, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00300-007-0296-9.

Madsen J., Tombre I. & Eide N.E. 2009. Effects of disturbance on geese in Svalbard: implications for regulating increasing tourism. Polar Research 28, 376–389, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-8369.2009.00120.x.

Magnhagen C. 1991. Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trend in Ecology and Evolution 6, 183–186, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90210-O.

McLennan J.A., Potter M.A., Robertson H.A., Wake G.C., Colbourne R., Dew L., Joyce L., McCann A.J., Miles J., Miller P.J. & Reid J. 1996. Role of predation in the decline of kiwi, Apteryx spp., in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 20, 27–35.

Nyholm E.S. 1965. Ecological observations on the geese of Spitsbergen. Annales Zoologica Fennici 2, 197–207.

Prestrud P. 1992. Food habitats and observations of the hunting behaviour of Arctic foxes, Alopex lagopus, in Svalbard. Canadian Field Naturalist 106, 225–236.

Prop J., Oudman T., van Spanje T.M. & Wolters E.H. 2013. Patterns of predation of pink-footed goose nests by polar bear. Ornis Norvegica 36,38–46, http://dx.doi.org/10.15845/on.v36i0.439

R Core Team 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Rockwell R.F. & Cooke F. 1977. Gene flow and local adaptation in a colonially nesting dimorphic bird—the lesser snow goose (Anser caerulescens caerulescens). American Naturalist 111, 91–97, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/283140.

Tombre I.M., Mehlum F. & Loonen M.J.J.E. 1998. The Kongsfjorden colony of barnacle geese: nest distribution and the use of breeding islands 1980–1997. In F. Mehlum et al. (eds.): Research on Arctic geese. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 200. Pp. 57–65. Oslo: Norwegian Polar Institute.

Vanderpuye A.W., Elvebakk A. & Nilsen L. 2002. Plant communities along environmental gradients of High-Arctic mires in Sassendalen, Svalbard. Journal of Vegetation Science 13, 875–884, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02117.x.

Van der Wal R. 2005. Plant–animal interactions. In M. Nuttall (ed.): Encyclopaedia of the Arctic. Vol. 3. Pp. 1649–1650. New York: Routledge.

Wisz M.S., Tamstorf M.P., Madsen J. & Jespersen M. 2008. Where might the western Svalbard tundra by vulnerable to pink-footed goose (Anser brachyrhynchus) population expansion? Clues from species distribution models. Diversity and Distributions 14, 26–37, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00408.x.
How to Cite
Anderson, H., Fuglei, E., Madsen, J., & van der Wal, R. (2019). High-Arctic nesting geese occupying less favourable nest sites are more vulnerable to predation. Polar Research, 38. https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v38.3352
Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)