China’s engagement in Greenland: mutual economic benefits and political non-interference
Abstract
With China becoming more active in Greenland, worries abound that China might have hidden intentions. Despite that, the Greenlandic government is showing an increasing interest in deepening its cooperation with China. This article explores Greenland’s motivation behind its positive attitude towards China and examines whether China will be a threat to Greenland’s independence. For Greenland, China is both a deep-pocketed investor and a huge consumer market, especially in the mining, fishing and tourism industries. Greenland, therefore, views China as an important partner in its economic development, which is necessary for its independence from Denmark. Considering China’s relationship with Denmark, its foreign policy and its affairs vis-à-vis Tibet, Xinjiang and Taiwan, it is not in China’s interest to interfere with any affairs related to Greenland’s independence.
Downloads
References
AMAP 2017. Snow, water, ice and permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA). Oslo: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.
Andersen T.M. 2015. The Greenlandic economy—structure and prospects. Economics Working Paper 2015–14. Aarhus: Department of Economics, Aarhus University.
Bjørst L.R. & Ren C. 2015. Steaming up or staying cool? Tourism development and Greenlandic futures in the light of climate change. Arctic Anthropology 52, 91–101, doi: 10.3368/aa.52.1.91.
Boersma T. & Foley K. 2014. The Greenland gold rush: promise and pitfalls of Greenland’s energy and mineral resources. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Breum M. 2020. “Greenland’s Premier: ‘We must work towards independence’”. High North News. Accessed on the internet at https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/greenlands-premier-we-must-work-towards-independence on 7 October 2020.
Briscoe P. 2013. Greenland—China’s foothold in Europe? Asia Unbound. Accessed on the internet at https://www.cfr.org/blog/paula-briscoe-greenland-chinas-foothold-europe on 7 November 2020.
China Daily. 2016. Chinese visitors to Iceland up by 660 percent. China Daily. Accessed on the internet at http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2017-06/13/content_29728471.htm on 12 December 2020.
Committee for Greenlandic Mineral Resources to the Benefit of Society 2014. To the benefit of Greenland. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Crona B., Wasse E., Barclay K., Mallory T., Fabinyi M. & Zhang W., Lam V.W.Y., Cao L., Henriksson P.J.G. & Eriksson H. 2020. China at a crossroads: an analysis of China’s changing seafood production and consumption. One Earth 3, 32–44, doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.06.013.
Dams T., van Schaik L. & Stoetman A. 2020. Presence before power China’s Arctic strategy in Iceland and Greenland. The Hague: Clingendael Institute.
Fløistad B. 1988. Fisheries, Greenland and the European Community formal independence—economic dependence. International Challenges 8, 6–10.
Gad U.P. 2014. Greenland: a post-Danish sovereign nation state in the making. Cooperation and Conflict 49, 98–118, doi: 10.1177/0010836713514151.
Gad U.P., Naja D.G., Holgersen A., Jacobsen M., Lave N. & Schriver N. 2018. Imagining China on Greenland’s road to independence. In L. Heininen & H. Exner-Pirot (eds.): Arctic yearbook 2018. Pp. 6–28. Akureyri: Northern Research Forum.
Government of Greenland 2014. Greenland’s oil and mineral strategy 2014–2018. Accessed on the internet at https://naalakkersuisut.gl/~/media/Nanoq/Files/Publications/Raastof/ENG/Greenland%20oil%20and%20mineral%20strategy%202014-2018_ENG.pdf on 24 December 2020.
Government of Greenland 2020. Greenland’s mineral strategy 2020–2024. Accessed on the internet at https://govmin.gl/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Greenlands_Mineral_Strategy_2020-2024.pdf on 5 January 2021.
Hansen K.G. 2013. The aluminium smelter project in Greenland—new aspects of an industrialisation process? Nordregio Report 3, 85–101.
Hansen T.B. 2018. Greenland’s desire for independence is a fight based on rhetoric and laws. Accessed on the internet at https://ruc.dk/en/news/greenlands-desire-independence-fight-based-rhetoric-and-laws on 12 February 2021.
Hirono M., Yang J. & Lanteigne M. 2019. China’s new roles and behaviour in conflict-affected regions: reconsidering non-interference and non-intervention. The China Quarterly 239, 573–593, doi: 10.1017/S0305741018001741.
Kleist M. 2010. Greenland’s self-government. In N. Loukacheva (ed.): Polar law textbook. Pp. 171–198. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
Kleist K. 2019. “The cold war is re-introduced in Greenland”. High North News. Accessed on the internet at https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/kuupik-kleist-cold-war-re-introduced-greenland on 3 January 2021.
Kurlantzick J. 2007. Charm offensive: how China’s soft power is transforming the world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lanteigne M. 2020. “Greenland’s widening world”. Over the Circle. Accessed on the internet at https://overthecircle.com/2020/03/28/greenlands-widening-world/ on 4 January 2021.
Lanteigne M. & Shi M. 2019. “China steps up its mining interests in Greenland”. The Diplomat. Accessed on the internet at https://thediplomat.com/2019/02/china-steps-up-its-mining-interests-in-greenland/ on 12 February 2021.
Martin N. & Ren C. 2020. Adventurous Arctic encounters? Exploring Chinese adventure tourism. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 20, 126–143, doi: 10.1080/15022250.2020.1743752.
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Fisheries Administration (China) 2019. China seafood. Imports and exports statistical yearbook 2019. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Denmark) 2017. Greenlandic ministerial delegation aims for more cooperation with China. Accessed on the internet at https://kina.um.dk/en/about-us/news/newsdisplaypage/?newsid=b9d6f451-8dac-4685-%208b25-e839c3a4dec4 on 10 December 2020.
Nuttall M. 2015. Subsurface politics: Greenlandic discourses on extractive industries. In L.C. Jensen & G. Hønneland (eds.): Handbook of the politics of the Arctic. Pp. 105–127. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Olsen I.H. & Shadian J.M. 2016. Greenland and the Arctic Council: subnational regions in a time of Arctic Westphalianisation. In L. Heininen et al. (eds.): Arctic yearbook 2016. Pp. 229–250. Akureyri: Northern Research Forum.
Rosen J. 2016. Cold truths at the top of the world. Nature 532, 296–299, doi: 10.1038/532296a.
Royal Greenland 2019. Annual report 2019. Nuuk: Royal Greenland.
Scrutton A. 2013. “Mining, China central issues in Greenland election”. Reuters. Accessed on the internet at https://www.reuters.com/article/us-greenland-election-idUSBRE92907F20130311 on 3 February 2021.
Sørensen A.K. 2007. Denmark-Greenland in the twentieth century. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Sørensen C.T.N. 2019. The ice dragon—Chinese interests in the Arctic. Hybrid CoE Strategic Analysis 5. Helsinki: European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats
Statistics Greenland 2020. Greenland in figures 2020. Nuuk: Statistics Greenland.
Visit Greenland 2019. Tourism statistics report 2019 Greenland. Accessed on the internet at http://www.tourismstat.gl/resources/reports/en/r31/Tourism%20Statistics%20Report%20Greenland%202019.pdf on 19 December 2020.
Wang Y. & Lidegaard M. 2015. “Deepening China–Denmark ties”. China Daily. Accessed on the internet at https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2015-05/11/content_20677199.htm on 13 January 2021.
Wildau B. 2011. “Visit from Greenland to China”. ScandAsia. Accessed on the internet at https://scandasia.com/9824-visit-from-greenland-to-china/ on 17 January 2021.
Xiao Y. 2018. Greenland: the anchor of Danish Arctic strategy’s transformation? Pacific Journal 26, 78–86.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Polar Research retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the Norwegian Polar Institute. Read the journal's full Copyright- and Licensing Policy.
