The polar sciences journal: the past and future of a crucial research instrument

  • Anna M. Gielas Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Keywords: Scientific publishing, international polar year, Norwegian Polar Institute, polar science, science journals, history of science

Abstract

Journals dedicated to the polar sciences have been outliers. Within both the history of science and the history of media, they stand out in several ways, including their comparatively late establishment of peer-review. It was not until the second half of the 20th century, that polar sciences journals began to carry predominantly peer-reviewed original research rather than synopses of research published elsewhere. This Perspective piece uses the 40th anniversary of Polar Research as an opportunity to look at the past of polar sciences periodicals—and invites reflection on their future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


Birkenmajer K. 2008. Editorial. Polish Polar Research 29, 3–4, doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2007.04.011.


Committee of Management 1931. Foreword. Polar Record 1, unpaginated, doi: 10.1017/S0032247400028941.


Crell L. 1778. Foreword. Chemisches Journal für die Freunde der Naturlehre, Arzneygelahrtheit, Haushaltungskunst und Manufacturen 1, 9–20.


Csiszar A. 2018. The scientific journal. Chicago: Chicago University Press.


Dancik B. 2014. Editorial/Éditorial. Arctic Science 1, i–iii, doi: 10.1139/as-2014-0001.


Gazni A. & Ghaseminik Z. 2016. Internationalization of scientific publishing over time: analysing publishers and fields differences. Learned Publishing 29, 103–111, doi: 10.1002/leap.1018.


Gjelsvik T. 1982. Foreword. Polar Research 1, unpaginated, doi: 10.3402/polar.v1982i1.7044.


Gui Q., Liu C. & Du D. 2019. Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: a network perspective. Geoforum 105, 1–12, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.017.


Leslie J. 1818. On a new mode of artificial congelation. The Philosophical Magazine 51, 411–421, doi: 10.1080/14786441808637578.


Littledale G. 1896. A journey across Tibet, from north to south, and west to Ladak. The Geographical Journal 7, 453–478, doi: 10.2307/1773990.


McDougall-Waters J., Moxham N. & Fyfe A. 2015. Philosophical Transactions: 350 years of publishing at the Society (1665–2015). London: The Royal Society.


Meinel C. 1993. Structural changes in international scientific communication: the case of chemistry. In G. Marino (ed.): Proceedings of the “Storia e Fondamenti della Chimica” Ottobre, Perugia, Italy. Pp. 27–30. Roma: Accademia Nazionale delle Scienze.


Moxham N. & Fyfe A. 2018. The Royal Society and the prehistory of peer review, 1665–1965. The Historical Journal 61, 863–889, doi: 10.1017/S0018246X17000334.


Newman B. 2019. Authorising geographical knowledge: the development of peer review in The Journal of the Royal Geographical Society, 1830–c.1880. Journal of Historical Geography 64, 85–97, doi: 10.1016/j.jhg.2019.03.006.


Stodart J. & Faraday M. 1820. Experiments on the alloys of steel, made with a view to its improvement. The Philosophical Magazine 56, 26–35, doi: 10.1080/14786442008652361.


Walsh J., Bromwich D., Overland J., Serreze M. & Wood K. 2018. 100 Years of progress in polar meteorology. In G. McFarquhar (ed.): A century of progress in atmospheric and related sciences: celebrating the American Meteorological Society centennial. Meteorological Monographs 59. Pp. 21.1–21.36. Boston American Meteorological Society.
Published
2022-09-12
How to Cite
Gielas A. M. (2022). The polar sciences journal: the past and future of a crucial research instrument. Polar Research, 41. https://doi.org/10.33265/polar.v41.8883
Section
Perspectives